President Barrack Obama has “evolved” to conform with the growing majority opinion across the country that LGBT Americans are Constitutionally entitled to the same rights as heterosexual Americans, including marriage.
The president had been inexplicably resistant to the idea of marriage equality even though his administration had otherwise made great strides in promoting LGBT rights. He always described his position on gay marriage as evolving. (As opposed to waiting for the right time, I guess. Classic Obama.)
Nevertheless, public opinion was changing and pressure was mounting. The Democratic party supplied the screws. Joe Biden tightened them on Meet the Press last Sunday. Then Amendment 1 passed in North Carolina. It imposes a state constitutional ban on gay marriage, civil unions, and domestic partnerships.
Apparently it combined with the previous environmental conditions to push President Obama’s evolution past the tipping point.
Obama is hilarious sometimes. But hey, you take the wins where and when they come.
This flip-flop/concession/self-realization/admittance of an actual belief moves us all one step closer to an America that recognizes the Constitutional rights of all citizens equally and the basic human rights of all humankind.
The Solid South was a voting block comprised of the repatriated Confederate states. From the reconstruction era until the late 1960’s the Solid South voted largely democratic, as the Democratic Party has been pro-slavery prior to the Civil War. For over 100 years, the Solid South allowed the Democratic party to enjoy a considerable political dominance, especially in the Congress.
In 1968, in an effort to break up the Solid South, Richard Nixon’s presidential campaign employed a tactic known as the Southern Strategy. It was a blatant appeal to racism. Republicans played on southern whites’ anger over the Civil Rights Movement. They joined the opposition to Civil Rights legislation, polarized racial divisions, and worked to discourage black voters from going to the polls.
It was a largely successful strategy. The GOP had finally broken the Solid South. It also popularized the euphemising of bigoted rhetoric.
Throughout our nation’s history, both parties have run on a variety of hate-based platforms. Of course, prior to the Civil Rights Movement, you could just come out and say who you wanted to discriminate against; we don’t want women in the workplace; we don’t like Jews, Irish, Chinese, etc. The Civil Rights Movement helped marginalize that archaic way of thinking. Hate-mongers were forced to find new ways of conveying their message. The Southern Strategy proved effective.
You start out in 1954 by saying, “Nigger, nigger, nigger.” By 1968 you can’t say “nigger” — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites…because obviously sitting around saying, “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nigger, nigger.”
Republicans didn’t care that it was a slap in the face of the black voters who had supported the party for over a century. The Southern Strategy helped sweep them into power. And they’ve never looked back.
Now, in every election, Republicans rail against the potential threat of the other. Rick Santorum compared gay marriage rights to the legalization of incest and bestiality. Santorum and and fellow presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich both immediately referenced black people when discussing welfare. Gingrich has generated additional buzz by referring to Barack Obama as the “Food Stamp President.” Michelle Bachmann and Donald Trump led a Republican movement demanding that Barack Obama produce his original, long-form birth certificate to prove his citizenship. If not these, then it’s illegal immigration, women serving in combat, or Sharia Law.
Hate-mongers can always find a reason to hate other Americans–even if they have to invent the reason out of whole cloth. And there is good cause to continue the practice so long as bigoted anger gets results at the voting booth.
Yet somehow Republicans dispute this obvious through-line of hate politics. According to them, they’re merely arguing the issues. Apparently it’s just pure happenstance that minority groups ALWAYS end up on the other side. That’s the danger of this coded language developed by the Southern Strategy. Everyone knows what it actually means, yet it allows Republicans to play the big innocent. It’s not about race, or gender, or religious beliefs; it’s about balancing the budget. What’s so wrong with that?
To be fair, there are a few minorities in the Republican party–whom the GOP loves to trot out before the media to chastise their own minority groups and blame them for being abused and discriminated against. What you don’t see from these minority Republicans is any effort to get the party to tone the rhetoric down (I’m sure they’d be thrown out on their asses if they did). I guess it is always better to have a whip in your hand than a plow.
So okay, we know racism is out there. We know that homophobes and Islamophobes exist. And we know misogyny and chauvinism are pandemic. Political opportunists and true believers alike will always try to leverage prejudice to their advantage. It‘s just politics, qué no?
But real people’s lives are being affected by this bigotry. The GOP works to deny minority groups those unalienable rights endowed upon all human beings by their Creator, and are currently enjoyed by many Americans, based on the antiquated idea that white heterosexual Christians are the real America and any expansion of that definition will lead directly to our nation’s demise. Those rights are not negotiable.
This is not some extreme, fringe element of the Grand Old Party. This is mainstream Republicanism. It’s accepted on both sides of the aisle.
Meanwhile, it’s nothing more than old school hate in latex gloves.
And it’s unmitigated bullshit.
It’s also the number 1 reason I hate Republicans.
Next up: How they make this whole shameful approach even worse in how they employ that bigotry. They use it to divide and disenfranchise the lower economic 99% of the population and line their benefactors’ pockets with billions.
Due to constructive-feedback from friends, I changed the title of this series of posts.
I have to begin with a caveat–not to soften my stance, but to make a distinction.
I do not hate conservatives.
In the many debates I’ve had with my conservative friends we could usually get to a point where finding some middle-ground at least seemed possible–if we didn’t reach it outright. There are, of course, plenty of instances where we’ve agreed to disagree but it’s clear enough that our core principles aren’t so far apart. I guess I’m saying that most of the conservatives that I’ve met have been pretty decent people. They love America and they want what’s best for it. That’s the reason I make the distinction.
The Republican party does not represent conservatives. Conservatives believe in fiscal responsibility, limited government, low taxes, a minimal (or nonexistent) welfare state, and strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. However:
NoRepublican president has overseen a balanced budget in over 30 years. (Anyone arguing that it was the Newt Gingrich-led congress that balanced the budget during Bill Clinton’s presidency would then have to explain why there wasn’t even an attempt to balance the budget under George W. Bush even though the GOP continued to control both houses of congress for his first 6 years in office). Don’t buy into the attacks on Clinton or Obama, the GOP’s premise is that Republicans are fiscally responsible so the burden is on them to show that responsibility.
Republicans don’t want limited government. They want to stick their noses into our bedrooms, books, movies, music, schools, women’s wombs (figuratively), and hammer us over the head with their fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible–which flies in the face of the 1st (FIRST!) Amendment. President George W. Bush and his Republican-led congress actually increased the size of the federal government and attached ineffective, wasteful spending programs to Medicare and the Department of Education among others.
Republicans don’t want lower taxes; they do want to lower taxes for the rich, as evidenced by their intransigence on such things as corporate subsidies and the Bush Era tax cuts. But their attempts to repeal the home mortgage interest deduction and shift the payroll tax credit away from employees, both of which primarily benefit the middle-class, show their true colors. How can taxes affecting the middle-class not count?
Republicans don’t want to end welfare. Well, they want to end it for the poor and unemployed (or at least humiliate them by requiring them to take drug tests and other such folderol). But they will fight tooth and nail to make sure the oil industry keeps every penny of their subsidies, even though big oil companies are among the most profitable businesses in the world. As a side note, many of the oil subsidies began as incentives to spur investment in oil production–which we can all agree is probably not necessary anymore. Yet those same Republicans fighting to keep oil subsidies chafe against providing similar subsidies to clean and renewable energy.
I could go on, but I think I’ve made the point. Republicans do not represent conservatives. To be fair, Democrats are even worse at representing progressives, and disregard of the population is a common practice among politicians. It’s the reason I have disdain for the Democrats as well (I’ll get to that later). The only real difference between the two parties is that Democrats still believe the government has a role in assisting the disabled and disadvantaged. Republicans could care less.
Republicans see America from one perspective: the white heterosexual Christian male. Obviously, a WASPy straight guy is a perfectly fine thing to be. The problem is, the further you identify away from that, the more you find the Republicans pissing in your eye. If you’re black, LGBT, Latino, Asian, Muslim, Native American, or a woman, they have no interest in helping you get to equal footing. They admit there is discrimination, but do nothing to combat it…unless the they feel the discrimination goes against whites.
Thus we come to the first reason I hate the GOP: Bigotry.
Believe me, it’s the bread and butter of Republican politics. Stay tuned for for part 1 to see why.